Liposomes as antigen carriers and adjuvants in vivo

Liposomes as antigen carriers and adjuvants in vivo

CHARACTERISTICS AND USE OF NE W-GENERA distemper with two different inactivated canine distemper virus (CDV) vaccines. Vaccine, 7, 521-526. Wahren,...

867KB Sizes 1 Downloads 76 Views

CHARACTERISTICS

AND

USE OF NE W-GENERA

distemper with two different inactivated canine distemper virus (CDV) vaccines. Vaccine, 7, 521-526. Wahren, B., Nordlund, S., Akesson, A., Sundqvist, V.A.

& Morein, B. (1987), Monocyte and iscom enhancement of cell-mediated response to cytomegalovirus. Med. Microbial. Immunol., 176, 13-19. Weiss, H.P., Stitz, I. & Becht, H. (1990), Immunogenic properties of iscom prepared with influenza virus nucleoprotein. Arch. Viral., 114, 109-120. Watson, D.L., Liivgren, K., Watson, N.A., Fossum, C., Morein, B. & HGglund, S. (1989), The inflammatory

Liposomes A.M.J.

response and antigen localization following immuni-

zation with influenza virus iscoms. Inflammation, 13,

641-649. Winter, A.J., Rowe, G.E., Duncan, J.R., Eis, M.J., Widsom, J., Ganem, B. & Morein, B. (1988), Effectivenessof natural and synthetic complexes of porin and 0 polysaccaride as vaccines against Bruce/la abortus in mice. Infect. Immun., 56, 2808-2817. Yewdell, J.W. & Bennink, J.R. (1990), The binary logic of antigen processing and presentation to T cells. Cell, 62, 203-206.

as antigen carriers and adjuvants Buiting

541

TION ADJUVANTS

(I), N. van Rooijen

(I) and E. Claassen

in viva

c2)

‘I) Dept. Celbiology, Med. Fat., Vrije Universiteit, POB 7161, 1007-MC, Amsterdam ‘2) Dept. Immunology and Med. Microbiology, Rijswijk (The Netherlands)

Introduction

Liposomes are artificially prepared spheres composed of concentric phospholipid bilayers, separated by aqueous compartments. Hydrophobic interactions of the phospholipids are the driving force of formation of liposomes when phospholipids are confronted with water. Liposomes may differ in their dimension, composition (different phospholipid and cholesterol content), charge (resulting from the charges of the component phospholipids), and structure (multi- vs unilamellar). These physical properties and the location of antigens in liposomes determine the adjuvanticity of the liposome. There are a number of important advantages of liposomes when used as immunoadjuvant : they are biodegradable, nontoxic, immunologically inert, simple to prepare and their composition can be varied to obtain the most efficient antigen-liposome preparation. In combination with other immunoadjuvants, liposomes may induce an extremely strong immune response. The toxicity of certain antigens can be reduced by their incorporation into liposomes, and liposomes can be used to modulate the immune response (reviewed by Van Rooijen, 1990a). Liposomes have the ability to elicit both a cellular mediated immune response (CMI; Garcon and Six, 1991) and a hu-

and

moral immune response (HI) to antigens administered by a variety of routes, and there is a potential for selective interaction with populations of immunocompetent cells (Gregoriadis, 1990). In some cases, liposomes can be stronger adjuvants than complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA; Gregoriadis and Manesis, 1980; Brynestad et al., 1990), but when the antigens are e.g. immunogenic proteins, the immune response is slightly higher when CFA is used as adjuvant (Sanchez et al., 1980; Alving et al., 1986). Inclusion of cholesterol or sphingomyelin in liposomes increases the stability of their phospholipid bilayers and decreases their susceptibility to destruction by various serum components (Scherphof et al., 1978 ; Kirby et al., 1980; Claassen et al., 1988). Cholesterol inclusion also influences the interaction of liposomes with lymphoid and non-lymphoid cells involved in immune reactions (Van Rooijen and Van Nieuwmegen, 1982). Immune antigens

reaction against and haptens

liposome-associated

The use of liposomes as immunoadjuvants was first described by Allison and Gregoriadis (1974). Since than, many studies have confirmed this capability to enhance the immune response to various antigens (Van Rooijen, 1988). Interest centred on the

M = mouse; G = guinea pig; R = rat ; sA = secretory IgA.

itr

S. sobrinus A. scopania

Bacteria Bacteria

ip

im gastric

BSA Lipid A

12.5 pg 7.5; 15 pg

0.18 mg 5 Pi% 7.6 kg 9.3 Ia 10 w 25 118

10 PFU o-o.1 pg

ip im iv iv

10 I43 2-10 pg 0.2; 1; 5 pg

50 I% 75 w 25 c(g 25 pg 0.5; 2.0 pg

o-2 w

1w 5 mg lipid 5 mg lipid

200 Ia

5 nmol

Dose

sA/G G/E

A sA/G

G,, G,, G,,, G,, M

M

M M/G G,/M G G/M G/M

M A

M

Isotype

of liposomes.

ip ip ip

ip b ip id

iv iv iv iv iv

ic SC

iv/ip/ic

Route

I. sendai S. mutants

Diphtheria toxoid Cholera toxoid Cyclosporin Sporozoite

con4

HSA

Phospatidylethanolamine

Carrier

Bacteria Bacteria

Glycolipid Lipid Lipid Virus Virus

(foreign)

Protein Peptide Protein Protein Protein Protein

(foreign) (foreign) (foreign) (foreign)

(foreign)

Protein

TNP

Peptide

3-(p-azobenzene arsonate)-Nacetyl-L-tyrosyl glycylglycine DNP BSA BSA DNP BSA BSA BSA BSA Hepatitis B Hepatitis B LPS Lipid A Lipid A HSVI HSVl Tetanus toxoid

Name

Antigen

Table I. Characteristics

CTL

DTH DTH

TH

DTH

T cells 1981

R M

1974

1989

El Guink et al., 1989 Jackson et al., 1990; Wachsmann et al., 1986 Gregory et al., 1986 Arora and Gangal, 1990

Gregoriadis and Allison, Alving et al., 1986

M R

M R

Lawman et al., 1981 Davis and Gregoriadis,

Beatty et al., 1980 Shek and Sabiston, 1982a,b Thtrien et al., 1990 ThCrien and Shahum, 1988 Sanchez et al., 1980 Manesis et al., 1979 Desiderio and Campbell, 1985 Yasuda et al., 1982 Naylor et al., 1982

Claassen et al., 1987

Neveu, 1987

Van Houte,

Reference

M M

M M M M M M G G M M M

G

t

M

Species

CHARACTERISTICS

AND

USE OF NE W-GENERA

possible applicability of liposomes as adjuvant to the immune system. Haptens as well as antigens (e.g. proteins) can be coupled to liposomes. Haptens are not able to elicit an immune response when given without a carrier. When haptens are coupled to liposomes, the immune response will be a thymusindependent IgM response, without the generation of immunological memory (Yasuda et al., 1977 ; Van Houte et al., 1979; Claassen et al., 1987). When antigen molecules are associated with liposomes, the immune response will be of the same type as when the antigen is given free in solution, but the response will be greatly enhanced. Liposome-associated antigens elicit a thymus-dependent immune response, including the production of both IgM and IgG antibodies and the generation of immunological memory (Van Rooijen, 1988). Immunity to antigens may be drastically improved through the administration of liposomes together with other adjuvants. For example, when liposomes were administered together with IL2, antibody responses were changed above or below levels attained with the liposomal antigen alone. Results depended on the amount and source of mediator given, its mode of presentation with the liposomal antigen and the IgG subclass tested (Tan and Gregoriadis, 1989; Davis and Gregoriadis, 1989). Lipid A influenced not only the adjuvanticity of liposomes (Alving et al., 1986) but could also switch a T-cellindependent antigen to a T-cell-dependent one (Zigterman et al., 1986); liposomes containing lipid A may also prevent the immunosuppression that is sometimes found after immunization with soluble antigens (Alving and Richards, 1990) (see also table I). Association

of antigens to liposomes

Antigens can be associated with liposomes in two ways. The antigenic determinant is (1) masked (encapsulated within the internal aqueous spaces of the liposomes) or (2) exposed (attached to the outer surface or reconstituted within the lipid bilayer of the liposomes; see Therien ef al., 1991). Surface exposition of antigens on the liposomes can be achieved by different methods of covalent binding of the antigen to the phospholipids used for preparation of the liposomes, or by non-specific adsorption of (partly) hydrophobic antigens (cf. Claassen and Van Rooijen, 1983). Hydrophilic antigens can be converted to hydrophobic (partly) antigens by their association with small hydrophobic molecules such as fatty acids. If the coupling of antigen and phospholipid is preformed before the preparation of the liposomes, the association of antigens with the liposomal bilayers will result. Liposomes can be taken up by non-receptormediated endocytosis, Fc-mediated endocytosis,

TION ADJUVANTS

543

phagocytosis, or complement-dependent phagocytosis (Wassef and Alving, 1987). It is also known that liposomes can be coated with many other plasma proteins, and some of these proteins might have opsonic activities (Bonte and Juliano, 1986). Protein antigens that are either encapsulated in or conjugated to liposomes incubated in mixed lymphocyte cultures, in which macrophages are also present, are presented to T helper cells (Alving and Richards, 1983; Burakoff et al., 1984). Antigen presentation to T cells is probably improved by the increased internalization of hydrophobic antigen by macrophages. When antigen is covalently coupled to the surface of the liposomes rather than being encapsulated within the vesicles, the antigen can be presented, although inefficiently, by B cells (Dal Monte and Szoka, 1989b).

Role of macrophages in the processing of liposomes The substantial enhancement of the humoral immune response to a liposome-associated T celldependent antigen (the liposomal adjuvant effect) has raised considerable interest in the use of liposomeencapsulated antigens as vaccines (AIving, 1987 ; Van Rooijen, 1990a). Since liposomes are avidly phagocytosed by macrophages, it has been proposed that macrophages play a central role in the processing and presentation of liposome-encapsulated (masked) antigens. Indeed, methods for depletion of macrophages in vivo or in vitro (resp. : Claassen et al., 1987 ; Claassen et al., 1990) have shown that macrophages are essential for the liposomal adjuvant effect. Intraperitoneal injection of carageenan in mice before antigen administration suppresses macrophage functions, and plaque-forming cell responses to liposome-encapsulated albumin were strongly decreased (Shek and Lubovich, 1982). Mice were intravenously treated with liposome-encapsulated dichloromethylene diphosphonate to deplete the splenic macrophages (but not lymphocytes and dendritic cells, Van Rooijen et al., 1988). Such pretreatment suppressed the primary immune response to a subsequent injection of liposomal albumin antigen (Claassen et al., 1987; Su and Van Rooijen, 1989) and other TI-2 antigens (Claassen et al., 1986). Reappearance of the splenic macrophages was accompanied by a simultaneous reappearance of the immune response to the liposomal albumin (Delemarre, 1990; Van Rooijen, 1992). An enhanced immune response to albumin was obtained after injection into mice of macrophages, that had previously ingested liposomeencapsulated albumin in vitro (Beatty et al., 1984). Finally, in vitro antigen presentation experiments have shown that macrophages are necessary and sufficient for antigen presentation of liposomeencapsulated antigens to T cells whereas B cells are

544

44th FORUM

IN IMMUNOLOGY

incapable of presenting a liposome-encapsulated antigen (Dal Monte and Szoka, 1989a; Harding et al., 1991). Based on the current status of research in this area, one could predict that in vivo processing would predominantly involve uptake, ingestion and fragmentation of liposomes by macrophages, with less common or less important contributions to the initiation of the immune response by other cell types such as B lymphocytes or dendritic cells (Claassen, 1992a,b). However it may well be that macrophages transfer the (pre)processed antigens to B cells or dendritic cells for further processing and final presentation to T cells, as suggested before (Van Rooijen, 1990b). It is possible that antigens which are bound to the liposomal membrane are processed and presented by nonphagocytic cells. Under circumstances of high antigen epitope density on the liposome surface, presentation of liposomal antigen may not necessarily be MHC-restricted (Walden et al., 1986; Dal Monte and Szoka, 1989b). Interactions of liposomes with cells in vivo

Liposomes containing both antigenic epitopes (peptides) and major histocompatibility gene complex molecules can stimulate T lymphocytes. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) use class I MHC molecules as restriction elements, T helper cells see antigens in association with class II MHC molecules (Schwartz, 1984). In the case of CD4+ T lymphocytes, dendritic cells can deliver all signals required for complete stimulation, as can macrophages and (activated) B cells. The function of CTL also depends on the presence of specialized accessory cells. It has been shown that these accessory cells can behave like scavenger cells (Debrick et al., 1991). The accessory cells use foreign antigen, in the form of cellular debris, as immunogen. These cells are also crucial for CTL induction because in vivo depletion of phagocytic cells completely inhibits CTL responses. In these animals, CTL activity could be restored by transfer of macrophages. All of the reappearing CTL used MHC restriction elements expressed by the infused macrophages. It was suggested that a cognate interaction between macrophages and CTL precursors initiates class I MHC-restricted immune responses. Activated T cells do not have to interact with viable accessory cells (Watts et al., 1984; Haskins et al., 1983; Staerz et al., 1984). Resting T cells are not stimulated unless they encounter Ag on the surface of appropriate antigen-presenting cells (Staerz and Bevan, 1986). Evidence has been given that macrophages act as accessory cells for CD8+ CTL during in vivo priming (Debrick et al., 1991). The authors also showed that a cognate interaction between ma-

ture T cells and macrophages initiates class I MHCrestricted responses. Targeting of Ag via liposomes in vivo (tissue)

Parenterally injected liposomes are rapidly ingested by macrophages, particularly in the liver and spleen, where they are degraded in lysosomal vacuoles (Segal et al., 1974; Claassen, 1992b). The distribution of intravenously administered liposomes in the body is strongly influenced by the liposomal characteristics (Gregoriadis, 1988), which can now be studied with a new carbocyanin-based labelling technique (Claassen, 1992a). The distribution of liposomes between liver and spleen depends on their cholesterol content. Cholesterol-poor liposomes were mainly taken up by Kupffer cells and cholesterol-rich liposomes by spleen macrophages. It has been postulated that cholesterol influences the binding of serum opsonins on the liposomes. This may in turn influence the uptake by macrophages (Moghimi and Patel, 1988). Uptake of liposomes in the spleen can also be manipulated by liposomal size and by the inclusion of ganglioside GM1 in the lipid composition of liposomes (Liu et al., 1991). Lysozyme entrapped in the splenotropic liposomes composed of PC/chol/GMl (elevated accumulation in the red pulp after i.v. injection) showed higher efficiency in potentiating the humoral response than that of either free lysozyme or lysozyme entrapped in hepatotropic liposomes composed of PC/chol (Liu et al., 1992). So, antigen delivery by liposomes to the splenic macrophage instead of the liver Kupffer cells is important in the liposomal adjuvanticity. These higher concentrations of antigen in the spleen are supposed to enhance the possibility of uptake, processing and presentation of the antigen by antigen-presenting cells, resulting in an elevated level of antibody production in the immunized animal. In our own studies, we found no marked differences in the distribution patterns in the murine spleen of intravenously injected liposomes with different membrane compositions. The level of cholesterol and charge of the bilayers of the liposomes were varied as well as the antigens/haptens that were coupled to the liposomes (Buiting et al., 1992). A more specific targeting of liposomes might be achieved by coupling of (monoclonal) antibodies to the surface of the liposomes (Connor et al., 1985), although we have found that targeting of antibody-enzyme conjugates was only possible when using monomeric antigenenzymatic conjugates (Van Rooijen et al., 1992). Evidence has been provided that synthetic muramyl dipeptide, liposomes and recombinant Gram-negative bacteria, exhibit adjuvant activity when given by oral route (reviewed by Mestecky,

CHARACTERISTICS

AND

USE OF NE W-GENERA

1987). Local secretory IgA antibodies and the serum antibodies were induced (Michalek ef al., 1984; Pierce et al., 1984; Gregory et al., 1986; Ogawa et al., 1986; Wachsmann et al., 1986; Jackson et al., 1990 ; Alving et al., 1986). The increase in secretory IgA is probably the result of vesicle interaction with the gut lymphoid tissue (Gregoriadis, 1988). Recently, a liposomal vaccine for use in humans has been developed (Alving and Richards, 1990). There are indications that it may be considered a safe vaccine which induces extremely high levels of antibody against a poorly immunogenic antigen (Alving et al., 1992). Intracellular

targeting of liposomes

Complexes of antigens and class I MHC glycoproteins can either be generated from the degradation of endogenously synthesized proteins or result from exposure of the antigen-presenting cells (APC) to exogenous peptides (reviewed by Townsend and Bodmer, 1989). Peptides in the cytosol of APC enter the endoplasmic reticulum and complex with newly synthesized class I proteins, which are then processed and transported to the cell surface via the golgi apparatus (Nuchtern et al., 1989; Cox et al., 1990). Exogenously supplied proteins are usually taken up and processed in the endosomes and the peptides generated complex with class II, but not usually with class I MHC proteins (Germain, 1986; Bevan, 1987). pH-sensitive liposomes have been developed that destabilize and become fusion-active at mildly acidic pH (Ellens et al., 1984; Straubinger et al., 1985; Connor et al., 1984; Collins et al., 1989). Significantly increased cytosolic levels of the entrapped contents have been observed when using these liposomes, as compared to contents delivered in conventional pHinsensitive liposomes (Connor and Huang, 1985). The mechanism of the enhanced delivery is probably related to the fusion of liposome membranes with the endosome membrane in response to the acidification of the endosomes (Collins ef al., 1990). References Allison, A.C. & Gregoriadis, G. (1974), Liposomes as immunological adjuvants. Nature (Lond.), 252, 252. Alving, C.R. (1987), Liposomes as carriers for vaccines, in “Liposomes from biophysics to therapeutics” (M.J. Ostro) (pp. 195218). Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. Alving, C.R. & Richards, R.L. (1983), Immunologic aspects of liposomes, in “Liposomes” (M.J. Ostro) (pp. 209-287). Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. Alving, C.R. & Richards, R.L. (1990), Liposomes containing lipid A : a potent nontoxic adjuvant for a human malaria sporozoite vaccine. Immunol. Letters, 25, 275-279.

TION ADJUVANTS

Alving, C.R., Richards, R.L., Moss, J., Alving, L.I., Clements, J.D., Shiba, T., Kotani, S., Wirtz, R.A. & Hockmeyer, W.T. (1986), Effectiveness of liposomes as potential carriers of vaccines: applications to cholera toxin and human malaria sporozoite antigen. Vaccine, 4, 166-172. Alving, C.R., Verma, J.N., Rao, M., Krzych, U. & Wassef, N.M. (1992), Liposomes containing lipid A as a potent nontoxic adjuvant : role of lipid A epitope density, in “41Lh Forum in Immunology” (N. Van Rooijen). Res. Immunol., 143, 197-198. Arora, N. & Gangal, S.V. (1990), Immunomodulation by liposome-entrapped allergen. Mol. Cell. Biochem., 97, 173-179. Beatty, J.D., Beatty, B.C., Paraskevas, F. & Froese, E. (1984), Liposomes as immune adjuvants: T cell dependence. Surgery, 96, 345-351. Bevan, M.J. (1987), Antigen recognition. Class discrimination in the world of immunology. Nature (Lond.), 325, 192-194. Bon& F. & Juliano, R.L. (1986), Interactions of liposomes with serum proteins. Chem. Phys. Lipids, 40,359-372. Brynestad, K., Babbit, B., Huang, L. & Pouse, B.T. (1990), Influence of peptide acylation, liposome incorporation, and synthetic immunomodulators on the immunogenicity of a l-23 peptide of glycoprotein D of herpes simplex virus: implications for subunit vaccines. J. Virol., 64, 680-685. Buiting, A. J.M., De Rover, Z., Claassen, E. & Van Rooijen, N. (1992), In vivo distribution of particulate antigens and liposomes in murine spleen. A possible role in the humoral immune response (in press). Burakoff, S.J., Weinberger, O., Krensky, A.M. & Reiss, C.S. (1984), A molecular analysis of the cytologic T lymphocyte response. Advanc. Immunol., 36,45-85. Claassen, E. & Van Rooijen, N. (1983), A comparative study on the effectiveness of various procedures for attachment of two proteins (L-asparaginase and HRP) to the surface of liposomes. Prep. Biochem., 13, 167-174. Claassen, E., Kors, N. & Van Rooijen, N. (1986), Influence of carriers on the development and localization of anti-TNP antibody-forming cells in the murine spleen. - II. Suppressed antibody response to TNP-ficoll after elimination of marginal zone cells. Europ. J. Immunol., 16, 492-497. Claassen, E., Kors, N. & Van Rooijen, N. (1987), Immunomodulation with liposomes : the immune response elicited by liposomes with entrapped dichloromethylene diphosphonate and surface-associated antigen or hapten. Immunology, 60, 509-515. Claassen, E., Westerhof, Y., Versluis, B., Kors, N., Schellekens, M. & Van Rooijen, N. (1988), Effects of chronic injection of sphingomyelin-containing liposomes on lymphoid and non-lymphoid cells in the spleen. Transient suppression of marginal zone macrophages. Brit. J. exp. Path., 96, 865-875. Claassen, I., Van Rooijen, N. & Claassen, E. (1990), A new method for removal of mononuclear phagocytes from heterogeneous cell populations in vitro, using the liposome-mediated macrophage “suicide” technique. J. Immunol. Methods, 134, 153-161. Claassen, E. (1992a), Post-formation fluorescent labeling of liposomal membranes : in vivo detection, localisation and kinetics. J. Immunol. Methods 147,231~240.

44th FOR WA4 IN IMMUNOLOGY Claassen, E. (1992b), Detection, localisation and kinetics of immunomodulating liposomes in vivo, in “Liposomes as an in vivo tool to study and manipulate macrophage function” 415’ Forum in Immunology. Res. Immunology, 143, 235-241. Collins, D., Connor, J., Ting-Beall, H.P. & Huang, L. (1990), Proton and divalent cations induce synergistic but mechanistacally different destabilization of pH-sensitive liposomes composed of phosphatidylethanolamine and oleic acid. Chem. Phys. Lipids, 55, 339-349. Collins, D., Maxfield, F. & Huang, L. (1989), Immunoliposomes with different acid sensitivities as probes for the cellular endocytic pathway. Biochim. biophys. Acta (Amst.), 987, 47-55. Connor, J. & Huang, L. (1985), Efficient cytoplasmic delivery of a fluorescent dye by pH-sensitive immunoliposomes. J. Cell. Biol., 101, 582-589. Connor, J., Yatvin, M.B. & Huang, L. (1984), pH-sensitive liposomes : acid-induced liposome fusion. Proc. naf. Acud. Sci. (Wash.), 81, 1715-1718. Connor, J., Sullivan, S. & Huang, L. (1985), Monoclonal antibody and Iiposomes. Pharmac. Ther., 28, 341-365. Cox, J.C., Yewdell, J.W., Eisenthohr, L.C., Johnson, P.R. & Bennink, J.R. (1990), Antigen presentation requires transport of MHC class I molecules from endoplasmic reticulum. Science, 247, 7 15-7 18. Dal Monte, P. & Szoka, Jr., F.C. (1989a), Effect of liposome encapsulation on antigen presentation in vitro. Comparison of presentation of peritoneal macrophages and B cell tumors. J. Immunol., 142, 1437-1443. Dal Monte, P. & Szoka, F.C., Jr. (1989b), Antigen presentation by B cell and macrophages of cytochrome c and its antigen fragment when conjugated to the surface of liposomes. Vaccine, 7, 401-408. Davis, D. & Gregoriadis, G. (1989), Primary immune response to liposomal tetanus toxoid in mice : the effect of mediators. Immunology, 68, 277-282. Debrick, J.E., Campbell, P.A. & Staerz, U.D. (1991), Macrophages as accessory cells for class II MHC-restricted immune responses. J. Immunol., 147, 2846-2851. Delemarre, F.G.A. (1990), The role of macrophages in the humoral immune response in lymph nodes and spleen of mice. Academic Thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Desiderio, J.V. & Campbell, SC. (1985). Immunization against experimental murine salmonellosis with liposome-associated O-antigen. Infect. Immun., 48, 658-663. El Guink, N., Kris, R.M., Goodman-Snittkoff, G., Small, P.A., Jr. & Mannino, R.J. (1989), Intranasal immunization with proteoliposomes protects against influenza. Vaccine, 7, 147-151. Ellens, H., Bentz, J. & Szoka, F.C. (1984), pH-induced destabilization of phosphatidylethanolaminecontaining Iiposomes: role of bilayer contact. Biochemistry, 23, 1532-1538. Garcon, N.M.J. &Six, H.R. (1991), Universal vaccine carrier. Liposomes that provide T-dependent help to weak antigens. J. Immunol., 146, 3697-3702. Germain, R.N. (1986), The ins and outs of antigen processing and presentation. Nature (Lond.), 322, 687-689. Gregoriadis, G. (1988). “Liposomes as drug carriers: re-

cent trends and progress”. John Wiley and sons, Chichester. Gregoriadis, G. (1990), Immunological adjuvants : a role for Iiposomes. Immunol. Today, 11, 89-97. Gregoriadis, G. & Allison, A.C. (1974), Entrapment of proteins in Iiposomes prevents allergic reactions in preimmunised mice. FEBS Letters, 45, 71-74. Gregoriadis, G. & Manesis, E.K. (1980), Liposomes as immunological adjuvants for hepatitis B surface antigens, in “Liposomes and immunobiology” (B.H. Tom & H.R. Six) (pp. 271-283). Elsevier, Amsterdam. Gregory, R.L., Michalek, S.M., Richardson, G., Harmon, C., Hilton, T. & McGhee, J.R. (1986), Characterization of immune response to oral administration of Streptococcus sobrinus ribosomal preparations in Iiposomes. Infect. Immun., 54, 780-786. Harding, C.V., Collins, D.S., Slot, J.W., Geuze, H.J. & Unanue, E.R. (1991), Liposome-encapsulated antigens are processed in lysosomes, recycled and presented to T cells. Cell, 64, 393401. Haskins, K., Kubo, R., White, J., Pigean, M., Kappler, J. & Marrack, P. (1983), The major histocompatibility complex-restricted antigen receptor on T cells. I. Isolation with a monoclonal antibody. J. exp. Med., 157, 1149-l 169. Jackson, S., Mestecky, J., Childers, N.K. & Michalek, S.M. (1990), Liposomes containing anti-idiotypic antibodies: an oral vaccine to induce protective secretory immune responses specific for pathogens of mucosal surfaces. Infecf. Immun.. 58, 1932-1936. Kirby, C., Clarke, J. & Gregoriadis, G. (1980), Effect of the cholesterol content of small unilamellar liposomes on their stability in vivo and in vitro. Biochem. J., 186, 591-593. Lawman, M.J.P., Naylor, P.T., Huang, L., Courtney, R.J. & Rouse, B.T. (1981), Cell-mediated immunity to herpes simplex virus: induction of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses by viral antigens incorporated into liposomes. J. Zmmunol., 126, 304-308. Liu, D., Mori, A. & Huang, L. (1991), Large Iiposomes containing ganglioside GM1 accumulate effectively in spleen. Biochim. biophys. Acfa (Amst.), 1066, 159-165. Liu, D., Wada, A. & Huang, L. (1992), Potentiation of the humoral response of intravenous antigen by splenotropic liposomes. Immunol. Letfers, 3 1, 177-182. Manesis, E.K., Cameron, C.H. & Gregoriadis, G. (1979), Hepatitis B surface antigen-containing liposomes enhance humoral and cell-mediated immunity to the antigen. FEBS Letters, 102, 107-I 11. Mestecky, J. (1987), The common mucosal immune system and current strategies for induction of immune responses in external secretions. J. Clin. Immunol., 7, 265-276. Michalek, S.M., Morisaki, I., Gregory, R.L., Kimura, S., Harmon, C.C., Hamada, S.A., Kotani, S. & McGhee, J.R. (1984), Oral adjuvants enhance salivary IgA responses to purified Streptococcus mutans antigens, in “Protides of the biological fluids” (H. Peeters) (p. 47). Pergamon Press, Oxford. Moghimi, S.M. & Patel, H.M. (1988), Tissue-specific opsonins for phagocytic cells and their different affinity for cholesterol-rich liposomes. FEBS Letters, 233, 143-147.

CHARACTERISTICS

AND

USE OF NE W-GENERA

Naylor, P.T., Larsen, H.S., Huang, L. & Rouse, B.T. (1982), In viva induction of anti-herpes simplex virus immune response by type 1 antigens and lipid A incorporated into liposomes. Infect. Immun., 36, 1209-1216. Neveu, P.J. (1987), Immunogenicity of hapten-carrier conjugates associated with liposomes. Int. Arch. Allergy, 84, 306-310. Nuchtern, J.G., Bonifacino, J.S., Biddison, W.E. & Klausner, R.D. (1989), Brefeldin A implicates egress from endoplasmic reticulum in class-I-restricted antigen presentation. Nature (Lond.), 339, 223-226. Ogawa, T., Kotani, S. & Shimauchi, H. (1986), Enhancement of serum antibody production in mice by oral administration of lipophilic derivatives of muramylpeptides and bacterial lipopolysaccharides with bovine serum albumin. Meth. Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol., 8, 117-125. Pierce, N.F., Sacci, J.B., Jr., Alving, C.R. & Richardson, E.C. (1984), Enhancement by lipid A of mucosal immunogenicity of liposome-associated cholera toxin. Rev. infect. Dis., 6, 563-566. Sanchez, Y., Ionescu-Matiu, I., Dressman, G.R., Kramp, W., Six, H.R., Hollinger, F.B. & Melnick, J.L. (1980), Humoral and cellular immunity to hepatis B virus-derived antigens : comparative activity of Freunds complete adjuvant, alum, and liposomes. Infect. Immun., 30, 728-733. Scherphof, G., Roerdink, F., Waite, M. & Parks, J. (1978), Disintegration of phosphatidylchohne liposomes in plasma as a result of interaction with high-density lipoproteins. Biochim. biophys. Acta (Amst.), 542, 296-307. Schwartz, R.H. (1984), The role of gene products of the major histocompatibility complex in T-cell activation and cellular interaction, in “Fundamental Immunology” (W. Paul) (p. 379). Raven Press, New York. Segal, A.W., Wills, E.J., Slavin, G., Black, C.D.V. & Gregoriadis, G. (1974), Morphological observations on the cellular and subcellular destination of intravenously administrated liposomes. Brit. J. exp. Path., 55, 320-327. Shek, P.N. & Lubovich, S. (1982), The role of macrophages in promoting the antibody response mediated by liposome-associated protein antigens. Immunol. Letters, 5, 305-309. Shek, P.N. & Sabiston, B.H. (1982a), Immune response mediated by liposome-associated protein antigens. 1. Potentation of the plaque-forming cell response. Immunology, 45, 349-356. Shek, P.N. & Sabiston, B.H. (1982b), Immune response mediated by liposome-associated protein antigens. II. Comparison of the effectiveness of vesicleentrapped and surface-associated antigen in immunopotentiation. Immunology, 47, 627-632. Staerz, U.D. & Bevan, M.J. (1986), Activation of resting T lymphocytes by a monoclonal antibody directed against an alIotypic determinant on T cell receptors. Europ. J. Immunol., 16, 263-270. Staerz, U.D., Pasternack, M.S., Klein, J.K., Benedetto, J.D. & Bevan, M.J. (1984), Monoclonal antibodies specific for murine cytotoxic T lymphocyte clone. Proc. not. Acad. Sci. (Wash.), 81, 1799-1803. Straubinger, R.M., Duzgunes, N. & Papahadjopoulos, D. (1985). pH-sensitive liposomes mediate cytoplasmic

TION ADJUVANTS

547

delivery of encapsulated macromolecules. FEB.9 Letters, 179, 148-154. Su, D. & Van Rooijen, N. (1989), The role of macrophages in the immunoadjuvant action of liposomes : effects of elimination of splenic macrophages on the immune response against intravenously injected liposomeassociated albumin antigen. Immunology, 66, 466-470. Tan, L. & Gregoriadis, G. (1989), The effect of interleukin-2 on the immunoadjuvant action of liposomes. Biochim. Sot. Trans., 17, 693-694. Therien, H.-M., Lair, D. & Shahum, E. (1990), Liposomal vaccine: influence of antigen association on the kinetics of the humoral response. Vaccine, 8, 558-562. Therien, H.-M. & Shahum, E. (1988), Immunopotentiation of the humoral response by liposomes : effect of a T cell polyclonal activator. Cell. Immunol., 116, 320-330. Therien, H.-M., Shahum, E. & Fortin, A. (1991), Liposome adjuvanticity : influence of. dose and protein : lipid ratio on the humoral response to encapsulated and surface-linked antigen. Cell. Immunol., 136, 402-413. Townsend, A.R.M. & Bodmer, H. (1989), Antigen recognition by class-I-restricted lymphocytes. Ann. Rev. Immunol., 7, 601-624. Van Houte, A. J., Snippe, H. & Willers, J.M.N. (1979), Characterization of immunogenic properties of haptenated liposomal model membranes in mice. I. Thymus independence of the antigen. Immunology, 37, 505-514. Van Houte, A.J. (1981), Immunogenic properties of haptenated liposomes in mice. Academic thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Van Rooijen, N. (1988), Liposomes as immunological adjuvants : Recent developments, in “Liposomes as drug carriers” (Gregoriadis, G.) (pp. 159-165). John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. Van Rooijen, N. (1990a), Liposomes as carrier and immunoadjuvant of vaccine antigens, in “Bacterial vaccines” (pp. 255-279). Alan R. Liss, New York. Van Rooijen, N. (1990b), Antigen processing and presentation in vivo: the microenvironment as a crucial factor. Immunol. Today, 11, 436-439. Van Rooijen, N. (1992), Macrophages as accessory cells in the “in viva” humoral immune response : From processing of particulate antigens to regulation by suppression. Seminars Immunol. (in press). Van Rooijen, N., Kors, N. & Kraal, G. (1988), Characterization of cell populations, reappearing in the mouse spleen after elimination by liposomeencapsulated dichloromethylene diphosphonate; reappearance of marginal lymphocytes is independent of marginal zone macrophages. Advanc. exp. Med. Biol., 237, 889-993. Van Rooijen, N., Ter Hart, H., Kraal, G. & Claassen, E. (1992), Monoclonal-antibody-mediated targeting of enzymes: a comparative study using the mouse spleen as a model system. J. Immunol. Methods (in press). Van Rooijen, N. & Van Nieuwmegen, R. (1982), Immunoadjuvant properties of liposomes. in “Targeting of drugs” (Gregoriadis, G., Senior, J. & Trouet, A.) (pp. 301-326). Plenum Press, New York. Wachsmann, D., Klein, J.P., Scholler. M., Ogier, J.,

548

44th FORUM

IN IA4MUNOLOGY

Ackermans, F. & Frank, R.M. (1986), Serum and salivary antibody responsesin rats orally immunized with Streptococcus mutans carbohydrate protein conjugate associated with Iiposomes. Infect. Immun., 52, 408-413.

Walden, P., Nagy, Z.A. & Klein, J. (1986), Major histocompatibility complex-restricted and unrestricted activation of helper T cell lines by liposome-bound antigens. J. mol. Cell Immunol.. 2, 191-197. Watts, T.H., Brian, A.A., Kappler, J.W., Marrack, P. & McConnell, H.M. (1984), Antigen presentation by supported planar membranes containing affinitypurified I-Ad. Proc. naf. Acad. Sci. (Wash.), 81, 75647568.

Wassef, N.M.

& Alving, C.R. (1987), ComDlement-

Synthetic lipopeptides

dependent phagocytosis of liposomes by macrophages. Methods Enzymol., 149, 124-134. Yasuda, T., Dancey, G.F. & Kinsky, S.C. (1977), Immunologic properties of liposomal model membranes in mice. J. Immunol.. 119, 1863-1867. Yasuda, T., Kanegasaki, S., Tsumita, T., Tadakuma, T., Homa, J.Y., Inage, M., Kusumoto, S. & Shiba, T. (1982), Biological activity of chemically synthesized analogues of lipid A. Demonstration of adjuvant effect in hapten-sensitized liposomal system. Europ. J. Biochem., 124, 405-407. Zigterman, J.W. J., Jansze, M., Snippe, H. & Willers, A. J. (1986), Immunomodulating properties of substances to be used in combination with liposomes. Inf. Arch.. 8 1. 245-252.

as novel adjuvants

W.G. Bessler (I) and G. Jung c2) I’) Institut fiir Immunbiologie der Universitiit, 07800 Freiburg (Germany) and “j Institut fir Organ&he Chemie der Universitiit, 07400 Tiibingen (Germany)

Summary

Introduction

Lipopeptides constitute potent novel immunoadjuvants in mice, rabbits and other species, enhancing markedly the immune response when given in mixture with antigens. Lipopeptides are non-toxic, non-pyrogenic and do not induce tissue damage when injected. They are thus well suited to replace Freund’s adjuvant avoiding its side effects; the antibody titres obtained using lipopeptide analogues are in most cases comparable to the titres obtained by administering Freund’s adjuvant. Lipopeptides also improve the efficiency of vaccines, which is important in decreasing the amount of vaccine required. Lipopeptides covalently coupled to low molecular weight haptens, e.g. peptides or toxins, are able to elicit high antigenspecific antibody titres in mice and rabbits. Conjugates containing B or T helper cell epitopes constitute novel synthetic vaccines which protect against viral infections by inducing virus-specific antibodies. When coupled to CTL epitopes, the conjugates are able to induce cy-totoxic T lymphocytes in vivo which eliminate virus-infected cells. Thus, due to their efficacy and their lack of side effects, these novel lipopeptide adjuvants provide a substitute for many conventional adjuvants.

Immunoadjuvants are substances enhancing the antigen-specific humoral or cellular immune response when given together with antigen. They are expected to show high effectivity and to lack side effects such as the induction of autoimmune or allergic reactions, cytotoxicity or tumour growth. Many immunoadjuvants consist of two components: one component acts as a deposit substance to protect the antigen from degradation. The most commonly used deposit substances are - in the human system - aluminum compounds (phosphate or hydroxide), and - in animal systems - Freund’s incomplete adjuvant in which the antigen is incorporated into the aqueous phase of a stabilized water in paraffin oil emulsion. Alternative deposit systems include liposomes or synthetic surfactants. The second component, present in many effective adjuvants, consists of substances of mostly bacterial origin which stimulate the humoral or cellular immune response, or which activate monocytes/macrophages. These stimulants either consist of killed bacteria or fragments thereof, or of defined constituents of the bacterial cell wall like muramyl dipeptide (MDP), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or lipid A analogues. In