Recycling of the rare earth elements

Recycling of the rare earth elements

Available online at ScienceDirect Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry Recycling of the rare earth elements Si...

499KB Sizes 0 Downloads 128 Views

Available online at


Current Opinion in

Green and Sustainable Chemistry

Recycling of the rare earth elements Simon M. Jowitt1, Timothy T. Werner2, Zhehan Weng3 and Gavin M. Mudd2 The rare earth elements (REE) are vital to modern technologies and society and are amongst the most critical of the critical elements. Despite these facts, typically only around 1% of the REE are recycled from end-products, with the rest deporting to waste and being removed from the materials cycle. This paper provides an overview of the current and future potential of the recycling of the REE, including outlining the significant but currently unrealised potential for increased amounts of REE recycling from end-uses such as permanent magnets, fluorescent lamps, batteries, and catalysts. This future potential will require a significant amount of research but increasing the amount of REE recycling will contribute to the overcoming some of the criticality issues with these elements. These include increased demand, issues over security of supply, and overcoming the balance problem where primary mine-derived sources overproduces lower demand REE without necessarily meeting demands for the higher demand REE. Addresses 1 Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4010, USA 2 Environmental Engineering Group, School of Engineering, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia 3 Independent Researcher, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia Corresponding author: Jowitt, Simon M ([email protected])

Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2018, 13:1–7 This review comes from a themed issue on Recycling and reuse Edited by Avtar S. Matharu, Raju K. Gupta and Vijay K. Thakur 2452-2236/© 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Introduction The International Union of Applied and Pure Chemistry (IUPAC) defines the rare earth elements (REE) as the 15 lanthanide elements plus Sc and Y [1]. Although the REE have similar electron configurations, they also have distinctive physical and chemical properties that enable their use in a broad range of technologies (Table 1). These properties mean that the REE provide special magnetic, luminescence and strength characteristics to the end-products they are used in (e.g., Ref. [2]). The properties of the REE are chemically derived from the fact that the majority of these elements have partially occupied 4f electron orbitals, making these elements often the only choice (i.e., no possible substitution) for

uses in a wide range of advanced industrial applications (e.g., Ref. [2]). This has led to the REE being crucial to a wide range of modern technologies, including uses in magnets, batteries, glass, and alloys, all of which are critical to the manufacturing of modern computers, magnets, lasers, and screens [3e5]. Current global primary REE production is about 130,000 metric tons of rare-earth oxide (REO) equivalent content per year [6], with the 2014 REE market worth wUS$2051 million [5], although the small amount of recycling of these elements means it is currently unclear how recycling could affect the REE market. Global demand for these elements has steadily increased although prices have remained steady after a significant spike caused by the application and subsequent removal of Chinese export restrictions (e.g., [5]) and a subsequent oversupply of some of the REE. The majority of REE consumption is by mature markets (e.g., catalysts, glassmaking, lighting and metallurgy; 59% in 2011; [7]) with newer high growth markets such as magnets, ceramics and batteries taking up the remaining 41% [7]. The increase in usage of the REE has led to a coincident increase in demand for these elements (e.g., [5]), although the vast majority of demand is still met by primary production from mines, primarily within China, which dominated the global consumption of 119,000 t of rare earth oxides (REO) in 2014 [8]. However, one of the main issues with REE mine production is the socalled balance problem, where the vast majority of REE production is dominated by La and Ce but the majority of REE demand is for Nd or Dy (e.g., [9,10]). This could lead to a situation where La and Ce are overproduced, and the demand for Nd or Dy for use in end-products such as magnets or batteries may not be met by primary production alone. However, this issue can at least partly be overcome by recycling as the products that would be recycled predominantly contain the potentially undersupplied Nd or Dy rather than the potentially overproduced lighter REE such as La or Ce [11]. One of the main obstacles to the recycling of these elements is the fact that the amount of REE used in end-products ranges from
2 Recycling and reuse

Table 1

Table 2

Summary of the rare earth elements and their common uses (adapted from Ref. [5]).

Summary of the main barriers to effective recycling of e-waste, and the applicability to the REE; adapted from Ref. [2].

Element La Ce Pr Nd Pm Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu Sc Y

Common uses

Barriers to e-waste recycling

Applicable to the REE?

Optics, batteries, catalysis Chemical applications, colouring, catalysis Magnets, lighting, optics Magnets, lighting, lasers, optics Limited use due to radioactivity, used in paint and atomic batteries; very rare in nature Magnets, lasers, masers Lasers, colour TV, lighting, medical applications Magnets, glassware, lasers, X-ray generation, computer applications, medical applications Lasers, lighting Magnets, lasers Lasers Lasers, steelmaking X-ray generation Lasers, chemical industry applications Medical applications, chemical industry applications Alloys in aerospace engineering, lighting Lasers, superconductors, microwave filters, lighting

End-products contain small amounts of metals targeted for recycling (g to

does take place is generally in the form of REE within permanent magnets, fluorescent lighting, batteries, and the REE that are used as catalysts within the chemical industry, including in petroleum refining (e.g., [14]). However, advances are being made in the recycling of these critical elements and this review outlines the current status of REE recycling (also summarised in Table 3) as well as areas with potential for increased recycling of these critical elements.

Recycling of the REE The small amount of the REE used in the majority of end-products containing these elements combined with the difficulty of the collection, extraction, and recovery of the constituent materials within end-products has hampered the recycling of the REE to date [15,16]. The recycling that does take place can be split into three types, namely the direct recycling of manufacturing scrap or residues, the urban mining of end-of-life products, and the recycling of solid and liquid industrial wastes [15]. The latter is somewhat atypical in that it utilises industrial residues rather than end-of-life resources, and as such is not considered here. An outline of the recycling potential of the REE is given in Table 4 [17], demonstrating the significant amount of the REE that could be recycled from magnets, NiMH batteries, and phosphorescent lighting alone. The material flow of the REE is also shown in Figure 1, which uses Nd in magnets as an example that illustrates current recycling as well as future potential. Magnets

The majority of current REE recycling is from permanent magnets, but even this is in relatively low amounts via approaches that include [12]: Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2018, 13:1–7

Yes, after reduction in REE prices associated with removal of Chinese export restrictions in 2014 Yes, but laboratory experiments that may scale to industry may remove this barrier

Yes, although the recycling of misch metals and REE alloys may remove some obstacles Yes, although less the case for e.g., REE magnets Unclear



Somewhat; the public are aware of the criticality of the REE but there are abundant REE resources already known, (e.g., Ref. [5])

 Traditional hydrometallurgical recovery techniques where magnets are dissolved in acids (or potentially in the future using ionic liquids) before the REE are precipitated out of solution.  Pyrometallurgical recovery techniques where REE alloys are remelted, are separated from alloyed transition melts in a liquid metallic state, are refined in an electroslag process, or are dissolved out of alloys by reaction with a molten flux, with the REE then supercooling with the flux to form a glass. The approach used depends on the nature of the REE alloys within the magnets.

Recycling of the rare earth elements Jowitt et al.


Table 3 Summary of the potential sources of REE during recycling. Source for recycling


Industrial process & residues Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) catalysts Other industrial processes and residues


Targeted REE

Primary recycling mechanism

LREE (La, Ce)


WEEE & ‘End of Life’ consumer goods Fluorescent material (phosphor [12,19,21,25,55–60] powder, fluorescent lamps, etc.) Magnets




Hydrometallurgical processes (leaching, solvent extraction, selective precipitation); Microbial leaching (bioleaching) Pyrometallurgical processes (roasting, Depending on the calcination); Hydrometallurgical processes source material, the REE recycling process (leaching, solvent extraction, selective can target different REE precipitation); Physical separation & microbial leaching (bioleaching) La, Ce, Tb, and Y

Nd, Dy and the other REE La, Ce, Pr, and Nd

Pyrometallurgy (roasting, calcination); Hydrometallurgy (leaching, solvent extraction, selective precipitation); Gas phase extraction Hydrometallurgical processes (leaching, solvent extraction, selective precipitation) Hydrometallurgical or Pyrometallurgical recovery routes

Table 4 Recycling potential of the REE. From Ref. [12]. REE application

Magnets Lamp Phosphors Nickel-metalhydride batteries Total

Estimated REE stocks in 2020 (tons)

Estimated average lifetime (years)

Estimated REE old scrap in 2020 (tons)

Pessimistic scenario: recycled REE in 2020 (tons)

300,000 25,000 50,000

15 6 10

20,000 4167 5000

3300 1333 1000

6600 2333 1750





 Gas phase extraction methods where the REE are transferred to a volatile chloride phase and are separated based on differences in volatility.

Optimistic scenario: recycled REE in 2020 (tons)

the contamination of this stream [18], potentially meaning that the recovery of the REE from this recycling stream is not possible. Fluorescent lamps

The manufacture of NdFeB magnets also utilises a number of grinding, cutting and polishing operations that can lead to nearly a third of input REE being lost as manufacturing scrap [12]. Some present end-of-life uses mean that it is possible in some cases to re-use magnets in their current form. However, this is typically only possible for larger magnets used in electric vehicles or wind turbines that appear less commonly in waste streams as a result of their longer usage lifetimes [17]. This leaves waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE; notably computer hard disk drives and mobile phones) as a more valuable source of end-of-life REEcontaining magnets. The pre-processing of WEEE involves the automatic sorting of NdFeB magnets, potentially resulting in crushed magnetic components being attracted to ferrous metal scrap. Although this behaviour can effectively separate the REE into a single output stream, the resulting mass concentrations are typically low and in most cases this approach results in

Energy-efficient and longer lasting compact fluorescent lamps have increased in use over the past two decades, leading to a coincident increase in demand for the REE in the form of REE (predominantly Y, Eu and Tb) phosphors (e.g., [19]). Typical fluorescent lamp waste contains >20% REE by weight (e.g., Refs. [19,20]) in the form of white, red, green and blue phosphors, each of which contain differing amounts of the REE (e.g., [12]). Recycling approaches include a) direct re-use, although this is only applicable in a very limited number of cases, b) the individual separation of phosphor components, a relatively simple approach but one that does not easily yield pure phosphor fractions, or c), chemical extraction of the REE, an approach that could yield individual REE for reuse in a variety of endproducts but one that is much more difficult and energy and chemically intense than the other approaches (e.g., [16]) The majority of research to date has focused on the extraction of Y and Eu from red Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2018, 13:1–7

4 Recycling and reuse

Figure 1

Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry

Circular flow diagram of the Nd element cycle (adapted from Ref. [37] with information from Refs. [11,38–40]), showing the cycling of Nd from mining (Mi) thorough refining and separation of Nd from the other REE (S), the fabrication of Nd-bearing products (e.g., magnets; F), the incorporation of these Nd-bearing products into end-products during manufacturing (Ma), the use of these end-products (U), and the final disposal of these end-products to waste (W) at the end of their useful lives, with the resulting Nd either deporting to waste or being recycled. Two recycling scenarios are shown, the status quo, where very little Nd is recycled as discussed in the text, and future Nd recycling by 2100 where a significant proportion of Nd can be recycled. Text in italics relates to possible future sources of Nd and the other REE either as a result of recycling or by the increased recovery of these critical elements from waste products generated within this cycle.

phosphors as these elements are relatively easy to recover and are high value (e.g., [19]). However, the La, Ce-, and Tb-bearing green phosphors are also an attractive target for future recycling, although these phosphors are harder to dissolve, requiring high temperature acid dissolution of molten NaOH or Na2CO3 approaches [19,21,22]. As emphasised by S Van Loy et al. [19], future research should focus on developing effective and efficient methods for the recovery of the REE from these green phosphors. Catalysts

The REE are extensively used in catalysts employed during hydrocarbon cracking and contain around 3.5% by weight of La with lesser amounts of Ce, Pr, and Nd [12]. There has been very little interest to date in recycling the REE within these catalysts, with research focussing on acid leaching [12]. This may be related to the fact that the REE in these catalysts are relatively low value (e.g., Ref. [5]), making it unclear whether the recycling Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2018, 13:1–7

of the REE in these catalysts is currently or indeed will become economic. Ni-MH batteries

Rechargeable nickel metal hydride (Ni-MH) batteries contain around 10% REE that are present in order to impart hydrogen storage capabilities [12,18]. These batteries use misch metals (alloys of the light rare earths generated by fused chloride electrolysis) or metallic stage LREE (predominantly La, Ce, Pr, and Nd) alloys. Until recently, the dominant recycling of these batteries was in stainless steel production as a cheap source of Ni, with the REE deporting to smelter slags and being lost [12,23]. However, the REE within these batteries could potentially be recycled using hydrometallurgical or pyrometallurgical recovery routes although both approaches are still in their infancy (e.g., [12]). In terms of the potential amounts of the REE that could be recovered from these (and other) batteries, Ueberschaar et al. (2017) [18] examined the apportionment of different elements

Recycling of the rare earth elements Jowitt et al.

during WEEE pre-processing. They determined that approximately one third of the REE in a typical WEEE waste stream could be manually sorted via the removal of batteries. Although this does not account for the majority of the REE contained in WEEE, the authors consider this to be a more attractive source for REE recovery as a result of a higher output mass fraction. However, P Sommer et al. [24] indicated that the low collection rates of batteries (i.e., in shavers, tooth brushes and cordless telephones) is a major inhibiting factor to the future recovery of these potential REE resources, again indicating that some of the inhibitors to REE recycling are logistical or infrastructural (e.g., Table 2).

Future developments in the recycling of the REE The future potential for the recycling of the REE is prevalent on the type of material being recycled, and a significant amount of laboratory-based research has been undertaken to develop potentially scalable approaches that would enable the broader recycling of the REE. However, recycling of the REE currently requires extensive dismantling and the development of efficient collection infrastructure. As described above, another major issue blocking future developments in the recycling of the REE is the lack of cost effective methods to purify the mixtures generated during the recycling of consumer devices such as WEEE. Some recent advances in research in this area provide insights into approaches that can tackle this issue. For example, Bogart et al. [25,26] developed an organic compound that could bind to REE cations, enabling the formation of different compounds for the light REE (LREE) and the heavy REE (HREE), with the LREE forming dimeric aggregations whereas the HREE compounds not aggregating. This generated solubility differences that were large enough to allow the effective separation of the LREE and HREE by filtration [25,26]. The optimization of this separation allowed the formation of specific REE pairs that are useful in manufacturing, for example Nd-Dy and Eu-Y that are used in permanent REE magnets and fluorescent bulbs. This new approach to REE recycling, if scalable, may provide a significant step towards increasing the recyclability of a wide variety of REE-bearing end products. It is important to also acknowledge that recycling is one among many possible responses to perceived REE supply risks. On the supply side, research and exploration should focus on the discovery of new mineral deposits, adapting existing mines to process the REE (e.g., monazite from heavy mineral sands mines; [27]), developing process technology for preferentially extracting the heavy REE (e.g., the Dubbo-Toongi project in Australia), as well as recycling. The potential for REE extraction from secondary sources such as low-grade REE industrial residues (e.g., phosphogypsum, slags, bauxite residue (red mud), mine tailings,


metallurgical slags, coal ash, incinerator ash and waste water streams) is also significant [12]. Studies like S Peelman et al. [28] have highlighted the potential for the extraction of the REE from mine tailings, in this case from the Kiruna iron ore mine in Sweden. Recovering the REE from acid mine drainage could also have economic, environmental, and strategic benefits (e.g., [29,30]). Equally, research into other methods of recycling should be promoted; for example, bioleaching has a much lower environmental footprint compared to other REE recycling methods (e.g., Refs. [2, 31e33]). On the demand side, research and development should focus on finding substitutes for the REE in different technologies or the finding of alternatives for these technologies altogether (if possible). While these latter approaches may seem less likely given generally low substitutability ratings [34], the substitution of Nd in NdFeB magnets was in fact a leading response to the socalled 2010 “rare earth crisis”, fostering a return to precrisis prices for this metal [35]. Indeed, tech companies like General Electric have been known to perform criticality assessments to reduce their dependence on the REE and other critical metals [36]. We can expect that the future recycling rates of the REE will thus be significantly influenced by the external efforts of both mining companies and manufacturers.

Conclusions The REE are among the most critical of the critical elements yet current efforts to recycle these valuable commodities are seemingly relatively ineffective. There is significant potential to increase the amount of the REE recycled from major end-uses, such as permanent magnets, fluorescent lamps, batteries, and catalysts; however, a significant amount of research is needed in all of these areas to increase the amount of these elements. Increased amounts of REE recycling has the potential to play a key role in addressing a number of criticality issues with these elements, including meeting increased demand, increasing their security of supply, and overcoming the balance problem between higher and lower demand REE and the concentrations of the REE available from primary mine-derived sources.

Acknowledgements This work builds upon previous research which has included support from CSIRO Minerals (Australia). We thank two anonymous reviewers for comments that helped improve the manuscript and Vijay Kumar Thakur for editorial handling.

References Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as: * of special interest * * of outstanding interest 1.

IUPAC: Nomenclature of inorganic chemistry – IUPAC recommendations 2005. Cambridge, UK: International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC); 2005.

Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2018, 13:1–7

6 Recycling and reuse


Izatt RM, Izatt SR, Bruening RL, Izatt NE, Moyer BA: Challenges to achievement of metal sustainability in our high-tech society. Chem Soc Rev 2014, 43:2451–2475.

23. Muller T, Friedrich B: Development of a recycling process for nickel-metal hydride batteries. J Power Sources 2006, 158: 1498–1509.


Maestro P, Huguenin D: Industrial applications of rare earths: which way for the end of the century? J Alloy Comp 1995, 225: 520–528.

24. Sommer P, Rotter VS, Ueberschaar M: Battery related cobalt and REE flows in WEEE treatment. Waste Manag 2015, 45: 298–305.


Weng Z, Jowitt SM, Mudd GM, Haque N: Assessing rare earth element mineral deposit types and links to environmental impacts. Appl Earth Sci Trans Inst Min Metall B 2013, 122:83–96.

5. *

Weng Z, Jowitt SM, Mudd GM, Haque N: A detailed assessment of global rare earth resources: opportunities and challenges. Econ Geol 2015, 110:1925–1952.

25. Bogart JA, Cole BE, Boreen MA, Lippincott CA, Manor BC, * Carroll PJ, Schelter EJ: Accomplishing simple, solubilitybased separations of rare earth elements with complexes bearing size-sensitive molecular apertures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016, 113:14887–14892.


Gambogi J: 2018 Minerals yearbook – rare earths [Advance release]. Reston, Virginia, USA: US Geological Survey (USGS); 2018.


Goonan TG: Rare earth elements – end use and recyclability, scientific investigations report 2011–5094. Reston, VA, USA: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS); 2011.


Gambogi J: 2014 Minerals yearbook – rare earths [Advance release]. Reston, Virginia, USA: US Geological Survey (USGS); 2016.

9. *

Binnemans K, Jones PT: Rare earths and the balance problem. J Sustain Metall 2015, 1:29–38.

10. Elshkaki A, Graedel TE: Dysprosium, the balance problem, and wind power technology. Appl Energy 2014, 136:548–559. 11. Yang Y, Walton A, Sheridan R, Güth K, Gauß R, Gutfleisch O, * Buchert M, Steenari B-M, Van Gerven T, Jones PT, et al.: REE recovery from end-of-life NdFeB permanent magnet scrap: a critical review. J Sustain Metall 2017, 3:122–149. 12. Binnemans K, Jones PT, Blanpain B, van Gerven T, Yang Y, Walton A, Buchert M: Recycling of rare earths: a critical review. J Clean Prod 2013, 51:1–22. 13. Eggert R, Wadia C, Anderson C, Bauer D, Fields F, Meinert L, * * Taylor P: Rare earths: market disruption, innovation, and global supply chains. Annu Rev Environ Resour 2016, 41:199–222. 14. Rombach E, Friedrich B: Chapter 10-recycling of rare metals. In * * Handbook of recycling. Edited by Worrell E, Reuter MA, Eds, Elsevier; 2014:125–150. 15. Li J, He X, Zeng X: Designing and examining e-waste recycling process: methodology and case studies. Environ Technol 2017, 38:652–660. 16. Kumari A, Jha MK, Pathak DD: Review on the processes for the * recovery of Rare Earth Netals (REMs) from secondary resources. In Rare metal technology 2018. Edited by Kim H, Wesstrom B, Alam S, Ouchi T, Azimi G, Neelameggham NR, Wang S, Guan X, Eds, Cham: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS) and Springer; 2018:53–65. 17. Blanchette ML, Lund MA: Pit lakes are a global legacy of mining: an integrated approach to achieving sustainable ecosystems and value for communities. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2016, 23:28–34. 18. Ueberschaar M, Geiping J, Zamzow M, Flamme S, Rotter VS: * * Assessment of element-specific recycling efficiency in WEEE pre-processing. Resour Conserv Recycl 2017, 124:25–41. 19. Van Loy S, Binnemans K, Van Gerven T: Recycling of rare * earths from lamp phosphor waste: enhanced dissolution of LaPO4:Ce3+,Tb3+ by mechanical activation. J Clean Prod 2017, 156:226–234. 20. Binnemans K, Jones PT: Perspectives for the recovery of rare earths from end-of-life fluorescent lamps. J Rare Earths 2014, 32:195–200. 21. Wu Y, Yin X, Zhang Q, Wang W, Mu X: The recycling of rare earths from waste tricolor phosphors in fluorescent lamps: a review of processes and technologies. Resour Conserv Recycl 2014, 88:21–31.

26. Bogart JA, Lippincott CA, Carroll PJ, Schelter EJ: An operationally simple method for separating the rare-earth elements neodymium and dysprosium. Angew Chem Int Ed 2015, 54: 8222–8225. 27. Mudd GM, Jowitt SM: Rare earth elements from heavy mineral * sands: assessing the potential of a forgotten resource. Appl Earth Sci Trans Inst Min Metall B 2016, 125:107–113. 28. Peelman S, Sun ZHI, Sietsma J, Yang Y: Hydrometallurgical extraction of rare earth elements from low grade mine tailings. In Rare metal technology 2016. Edited by Alam S, Kim H, Neelameggham NR, Ouchi T, Oosterhof H, Eds, Cham: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS) and Springer; 2016:17–29. 29. Wilfong WC, Kail BW, Bank TL, Howard BH, Gray ML: Recov* ering rare earth elements from aqueous solution with porous amine–epoxy networks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017, 9: 18283–18294. 30. López J, Reig M, Torres E, Ayora C, Cortina JL: Application of nanofiltration for acidic waters containing rare earth elements: influence of transition elements, acidity and membrane stability. Desalination 2018, 430:33–44. 31. Qu Y, Li H, Wang X, Wang X, Jia X, Shi B, Song G, Tang Y: Leaching of valuable metals from red mud via batch and continuous processes by using fungi. Miner Eng 2015, 81: 1–4. 32. Reed DW, Fujita Y, Daubaras DL, Jiao Y, Thompson VS: Bioleaching of rare earth elements from waste phosphors and cracking catalysts. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 166:34–40. 33. Wang J, Huang X, Cui D, Wang L, Feng Z, Hu B, Long Z, Zhao N: Recovery of rare earths and aluminum from FCC waste slag by acid leaching and selective precipitation. J Rare Earths 2017, 35:1141–1148. 34. Graedel TE, Harper EM, Nassar NT, Reck BK: On the materials * basis of modern society. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112: 6295–6300. 35. Sprecher B, Daigo I, Murakami S, Kleijn R, Vos M, Kramer GJ: Framework for resilience in material supply chains, with a case study from the 2010 rare earth crisis. Environ Sci Technol 2015, 49:6740–6750. 36. GE: Resource productivity – materials sustainability. General Electric (GE); 2018. [Accessed 5 February 2018]. 37. Du X, Graedel TE: Global in-use stocks of the rare earth elements: a first estimate. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45: 4096–4101. 38. Dai AX, Lippincott CA, Nissan ME, Shim R: Recycling of neodymium and dysprosium from permanent magnets. University of Pennsylvania; 2016. Senior Design Reports (CBE), Paper 81, 39. Sekine N, Daigo I, Goto Y: Dynamic substance flow analysis of * neodymium and dysprosium associated with neodymium magnets in Japan. J Ind Ecol 2017, 21:356–367. 40. Binnemans K, Jones PT, Blanpain B, Van Gerven T, Pontikes Y: Towards zero-waste valorisation of rare-earth-containing industrial process residues: a critical review. J Clean Prod 2015, 99:17–38.

22. Porob DG, Srivistava AM, Nammalwar PK, Ramachandran GC, Comanzo HA: Rare earth recovery from fluorescent material and associated method. US Patent (US8137645B2) 2012.

41. Innocenzi V, Ferella F, De Michelis I, Vegliò F: Treatment of fluid catalytic cracking spent catalysts to recover lanthanum and

Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2018, 13:1–7

Recycling of the rare earth elements Jowitt et al.

cerium: comparison between selective precipitation and solvent extraction. J Ind Eng Chem 2015, 24:92–97. 42. Wang J, Huang X, Wang L, Wang Q, Yan Y, Zhao N, Cui D, Feng Z: Kinetics study on the leaching of rare earth and aluminum from FCC catalyst waste slag using hydrochloric acid. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 171:312–319. 43. Wang J, Xu Y, Wang L, Zhao L, Wang Q, Cui D, Long Z, Huang X: Recovery of rare earths and aluminum from FCC catalysts manufacturing slag by stepwise leaching and selective precipitation. J Environ Chem Eng 2017, 5:3711–3718. 44. Zhao Z, Qiu Z, Yang J, Lu S, Cao L, Zhang W, Xu Y: Recovery of rare earth elements from spent fluid catalytic cracking catalysts using leaching and solvent extraction techniques. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 167:183–188. 45. Abisheva ZS, Karshigina ZB, Bochevskaya YG, Akcil A, Sargelova EA, Kvyatkovskaya MN, Silachyov IY: Recovery of rare earth metals as critical raw materials from phosphorus slag of long-term storage. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 173:271–282. 46. Karshigina Z, Abisheva ZS, Bochevskaya Y, Akcil A, Sargelova E: Recovery of rare earth metals and precipitated silicon dioxide from phosphorus slag. Miner Eng 2015, 77:159–166.


57. Innocenzi V, Ippolito NM, Pietrelli L, Centofanti M, Piga L, * Vegliò F: Application of solvent extraction operation to recover rare earths from fluorescent lamps. J Clean Prod 2018, 172:2840–2852. 58. Ippolito NM, Innocenzi V, De Michelis I, Medici F, Vegliò F: Rare earth elements recovery from fluorescent lamps: a new thermal pretreatment to improve the efficiency of the hydrometallurgical process. J Clean Prod 2017, 153: 287– 298. 59. Liao C, Li Z, Zeng Y, Chen J, Zhong L, Wang L: Selective extraction and recovery of rare earth metals from waste fluorescent powder using alkaline roasting-leaching process. J Rare Earths 2017, 35:1008–1013. 60. Machacek E, Richter JL, Habib K, Klossek P: Recycling of rare * earths from fluorescent lamps: value analysis of closing-theloop under demand and supply uncertainties. Resour Conserv Recycl 2015, 104:76–93. 61. Akahori T, Miyamoto Y, Saeki T, Okamoto M, Okabe TH: Optimum conditions for extracting rare earth metals from waste magnets by using molten magnesium. J Alloy Comp 2017, 703:337–343.

47. Liang Y, Li Y, Xue L, Zou Y: Extraction of rare earth elements from fluoride molten salt electrolytic slag by mineral phase reconstruction. J Clean Prod 2018, 177:567–572.

62. Gergoric M, Ekberg C, Foreman MRSJ, Steenari B-M, Retegan T: * Characterization and leaching of neodymium magnet waste and solvent extraction of the rare-earth elements using TODGA. J Sustain Metall 2017, 3:638–645.

48. Sahin AK, Voßenkaul D, Stoltz N, Stopic S, Saridede MN, Friedrich B: Selectivity potential of ionic liquids for metal extraction from slags containing rare earth elements. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 169:59–67.

63. Lixandru A, Poenaru I, Güth K, Gauß R, Gutfleisch O: A systematic study of HDDR processing conditions for the recycling of end-of-life Nd-Fe-B magnets. J Alloy Comp 2017, 724:51–61.

49. Walawalkar M, Nichol CK, Azimi G: Process investigation of the acid leaching of rare earth elements from phosphogypsum using HCl, HNO3, and H2SO4. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 166: 195–204.

64. Lixandru A, Venkatesan P, Jönsson C, Poenaru I, Hall B, Yang Y, * * Walton A, Güth K, Gauß R, Gutfleisch O: Identification and recovery of rare-earth permanent magnets from waste electrical and electronic equipment. Waste Manag 2017, 68: 482–489.

50. Borra CR, Mermans J, Blanpain B, Pontikes Y, Binnemans H, Van Gerven T: Selective recovery of rare earths from bauxite residue by combination of sulfation, roasting and leaching. Miner Eng 2016, 92:151–159. 51. Qu Y, Lian B: Bioleaching of rare earth and radioactive elements from red mud using penicillium tricolor RM-10. Bioresour Technol 2013, 136. 52. Gao S, Luo T, Zhou Q, Luo W: A novel and efficient method on the recovery of nanosized CeO2 in Ce3+ wastewater remediation using modified sawdust as adsorbent. J Colloid Interface Sci 2018, 512:629–637. 53. Scharf C, Ditze A: Recycling of black dross containing rare earths originating from melting and recycling of magnesium alloys. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 157:140–148. 54. Zhou Q, Luo T, Yang H, Liang C, Jing L, Luo W: From fly ash waste slurry to functional adsorbent for valuable rare earth ion separation: an ingenious combination process involving modification, dewatering and grafting. J Colloid Interface Sci 2018, 513:427–437. 55. He L, Ji W, Yin Y, Sun W: Study on alkali mechanical activation for recovering rare earth from waste fluorescent lamps. J Rare Earths 2018, 36:108–112. 56. Hopfe S, Flemming K, Lehmann F, Möckel R, Kutschke S, Pollmann K: Leaching of rare earth elements from fluorescent powder using the tea fungus Kombucha. Waste Manag 2017, 62:211–221.

65. Önal MAR, Borra CR, Guo M, Blanpain B, Van Gerven T: Hydrometallurgical recycling of NdFeB magnets: complete leaching, iron removal and electrolysis. J Rare Earths 2017, 35:574–584. 66. Peeters JR, Bracqguene E, Nelen D, Ueberschaar M, Van Acker K, Duflou JR: Forecasting the recycling potential based on waste analysis: a case study for recycling Nd-Fe-B magnets from hard disk drives. J Clean Prod 2018, 175: 96–108. 67. Schulze R, Buchert M: Estimates of global REE recycling po* * tentials from NdFeB magnet material. Resour Conserv Recycl 2016, 113:12–27. 68. Tunsu C, Petranikova M, Gergori c M, Ekberg C, Retegan T: * Reclaiming rare earth elements from end-of-life products: a review of the perspectives for urban mining using hydrometallurgical unit operations. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 156: 239–258. 69. Yadav KK, Anitha M, Singh DK, Kain V: NdFeB magnet recycling: dysprosium recovery by non-dispersive solvent extraction employing hollow fibre membrane contactor. Separ Purif Technol 2018, 194:265–271. 70. Zakotnik M, Tudor CO, Peiró LT, Afiuny P, Skomski P, Hatch GP: Analysis of energy usage in Nd-Fe-B magnet to magnet recycling. Environ Technol Innov 2016, 5:117–126.

Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2018, 13:1–7