Water Science and Engineering 2018, 11(3): 243e249
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
H O S T E D BY
Water Science and Engineering journal homepage: http://wse.hhu.edu.cn
Statistical description of depth-dependent turbulent velocity measured in Taihu Lake, China Lin Yuan a,b, Hong-guang Sun a,b,*, Yong Zhang c, Yi-ping Li d, Bing-qing Lu c a
State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China b College of Mechanics and Materials, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China c Department of Geological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA d College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China Received 19 July 2017; accepted 10 May 2018 Available online 26 September 2018
Abstract Quantitative description of turbulence using simple physical/mathematical models remains a challenge in classical physics and hydrologic dynamics. This study monitored the turbulence velocity field at the surface and bottom of Taihu Lake, in China, a large shallow lake with a heterogeneous complex system, and conducted a statistical analysis of the data for the local turbulent structure. Results show that the measured turbulent flows with finite Reynolds numbers exhibit properties of non-Gaussian distribution. Compared with the normal distribution, the Levy distribution with meaningful parameters can better characterize the tailing behavior of the measured turbulence. Exit-distance statistics and multiscaling extended self-similarity (ESS) were used to interpret turbulence dynamics with different scale structures. Results show that the probability density function of the reverse structure distance and the multiscaling ESS can effectively capture the turbulent flow dynamics varying with water depth. These results provide an approach for quantitatively analyzing multiscale turbulence in large natural lakes. © 2018 Hohai University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Keywords: Finite Reynolds number turbulence; Reverse structure function; Levy distribution; Probability density function; Multiscaling extended self-similarity (ESS)
1. Introduction Lakes are among the major global freshwater resources, with hydrologic properties such as turbulent flows that can affect sediment dynamics and aquatic system evolution. Presently, pollutants discharged from lakes far exceed the selfrenewal capacities of lake water, resulting in various environmental problems. One of the main causes is the indigenous nutrient release from the bottom of shallow lakes (Wetzel,
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0405203), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11572112, 41628202, and 41330632) * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected]
(Hong-guang Sun). Peer review under responsibility of Hohai University.
2001). Suspended sediment can interact with nutrients through adsorption and desorption (Chao et al., 2008). Windinduced currents and waves have been found to dominate sediment transport and resuspension in shallow lakes (Csanady, 1973; Liang and Zhong, 1994; Han et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2012). Many studies have focused on basic processes of sediment transport, such as sediment resuspension under the impact of flow circulation (Jin and Sun, 2007), sediment transport due to wind-induced wave action (Luettich et al., 1990; Hawley and Lesht, 1992), and deposition (Mehta and Partheniades, 1975). However, the sediment resuspension process is the direct result of the disturbed vertical velocity. From this perspective, macroscopic analysis and description of sediment, without reliable exploration of the small-scale velocity structure, may not be sufficient to characterize the resuspension dynamics. Due to the complexity of natural
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2018.09.005 1674-2370/© 2018 Hohai University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Lin Yuan et al. / Water Science and Engineering 2018, 11(3): 243e249
lakes, standard statistical analysis may be inadequate to explain the mechanism of natural processes. Novel statistical analysis methods are needed to identify velocity fluctuations in turbulence (Frisch, 1995) and interpret real environmental processes. Turbulence is a flow regime with multi-scale chaotic changes in pressure and flow velocity (Holmes et al., 1998; Tabeling, 2002; Stull, 2012; Davidson, 2015). However, we do not yet have a physical understanding of real turbulence, or a well developed manner of statistically describing it (Feynman et al., 1966; Nelkin, 1992; Svihlov a et al., 2017). In traditional statistical analysis, turbulence is often regarded as a random field, and a structure function is used to describe its statistical characteristics. Kolmogorov (1968) proposed a structure function describing the local turbulent structure based on dimensional analysis, and found that the velocity of a flow particle in homogeneous isotropic turbulent flow with a sufficiently high Reynolds number (i.e., developed turbulence) in the inertial sub-region satisfies ul ¼ ðεlÞ1=3 , where ul is the velocity, ε is the turbulence dissipation rate, and l is the scale. The structure function means that the velocity difference of the fluid particle satisfies the following scaling law: 〈jduðrÞjp 〉fr xðpÞ
where duðrÞ represents the velocity difference between two points x and x þ r, with r being the spatial distance, and duðrÞ ¼ uðx þ rÞ uðxÞ; p is the order; x is the scaling index; and 〈,〉 represents the ensemble average. According to the structure function, Kolmogorov (1941) proposed the K41 similarity assumption: xðpÞ ¼ p=3, corresponding to the inertial-region scaling law. When describing the small-scale statistical characteristics of turbulence, the inertial-region scaling law is strictly true only if the Reynolds number tends to infinity. In actual turbulence, the existence of coherent structures leads to the intermittent instantaneous turbulent energy consumption (Douady et al., 1991; Vincent and Meneguzzi, 1991; Liu and Jiang, 2004), indicating that there is an essential difference between the real turbulent flow field and the completely random field in Kolmogorov (1941). The movement of a particle in turbulence is affected by the corresponding turbulence structure, and the motion of the fluid mass is not completely random (Liu and Jiang, 2004). At this time, due to the nonlinear scaling feature of the structure function, the scaling structure in the turbulent inertial region exhibits different scaling features, and the K41 similarity assumption is not suitable for real turbulence. In view of the complexity of the actual turbulence structure, Jensen (1999) proposed a reverse method to describe and analyze the turbulent velocity field, and defined a reverse structure function to explore the scaling relation: 〈jrðduÞjp 〉fduzðpÞ
where rðduÞ is the reverse structure distance, also called the exit distance, which is defined as the minimum distance
between two fluid masses with velocity difference exceeding du; and zðpÞ is the exit-distance order, also known as the inverse statistical order. According to the K41 hypothesis, the scaling relation of the inverse structure function can be obtained theoretically: zðpÞ ¼ 3p (Jensen, 1999). However, the results obtained from the actual turbulence model do not reflect a similar relationship (Frisch, 1991). Therefore, the study of turbulence reverse structure functions is far from perfect. There are many studies and applications focusing on reverse statistical analysis. For example, Biferale et al. (2001) provided numerical evidence that the reverse structure analysis of two-dimensional turbulent flows can reveal a rich multiscale structure. Viggiano et al. (2016) used the inverse structure functions to study the statistical properties of canonical wind turbine array boundary layer flow. Zhou et al. (2006) found that the statistical functions of exit distances can be approximated by stretched exponentials. In natural sciences, many complex behaviors and phenomena are widely distributed at spatiotemporal scales, which can be quantified by a non-Gaussian probability density function (PDF) within a given scale range (Frisch, 1995). In turbulence, the Levy stable distribution (Uchaikin and Zolotarev, 1999; Nolan, 2003) completely solved the question of scaling and the paradigm of fractals, and dealt with the divergence of high-order moments of the PDF (Shlesinger et al., 1987). The Levy stable distribution has four parameters: the stability index a (0 < a 2), skewness parameter b (1 < b < 1), scale parameter g (g > 0), and location parameter d (d 2 R). When a ¼ 2 or a ¼ 1, the Levy stable distribution reduces to a Gaussian distribution or Cauchy distribution, respectively. Nolan (2003) summarized statistical characteristics of Levy distribution. Studies of turbulence have found that these non-Gaussian physical quantities obey Levy stable distributions (Chen and Zhou, 2005). Moreover, the Levy stable distribution has been widely applied to the statistical-mechanical description of dynamic turbulence systems, such as Levy flight (Feller, 2008), random processes based on Levy stable distributions, and Levy walks (Shlesinger et al., 1987), which are random walks with a nonlocal memory coupled in space and time in a scaling fashion. We propose a Levy stable distribution to provide insight into the power law probability distribution of the disturbed vertical velocity. In this study, the method of turbulence theory was used to analyze the non-Gaussian property and reverse structure function for turbulence, focusing on the turbulent flow field with a finite Reynolds number in a real scenario. Statistical analysis were conducted for the turbulent velocity with a finite Reynolds number in the surface and deep layers of Dongtaihu Bay (detailed information can be found in Li et al. (2017)). The velocities measured in both layers were analyzed in this study. Hu et al. (2010) found that the water transfer/renewal rate in Dongtaihu Bay is one-tenth of the average water transfer rates in Taihu Lake. Hence, it is necessary to study water transfer rates, which can be done by investigating the vertical profile. The disturbed vertical velocity in Dongtaihu Bay was measured using an acoustic Doppler current profiler
Lin Yuan et al. / Water Science and Engineering 2018, 11(3): 243e249
(ADCP), an ultra-precise instrument, and velocity structures in different flow layers were evaluated. The rest of this paper is organized as follows: We first analyze the fluctuation values of the turbulent flow velocity statistically and then identify the non-Gaussian properties of the distribution. Next, we examine the flow velocity using the reverse structure function, and analyze different turbulence layer distributions at distances r with different du values. Finally, based on the multiscaling extended self-similarity (ESS), we analyze the characteristics of the turbulence velocity scale law in different flow layers with a finite Reynolds number. 2. Observation of turbulent flow velocities in surface and deep layers in Taihu Lake Two time series datasets were considered. They were measured in the surface and deep layers in the east bay of Taihu Lake. Taihu Lake is located southeast of the Yangtze River, near Wuxi City of Jiangsu Province. It is the third largest freshwater lake in China, with an area of 2338 km2 and an average depth of 1.9 m. The surface area of Dongtaihu Bay is 131 km2, about 97% of which is covered by macrophytes (Qu et al., 2001). The three-dimensional instantaneous velocity (at a depth of 40 cm) was measured by an ADCP (Argonaut-XR, SonTek company, USA) at 8:00e16:00 on 25e27 May, 2015, and the mean value was 0.0256 cm/s. The deep instantaneous velocity (at a depth of 195 cm) was measured using an acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) Ocean (ADV SonTek company, USA) (5 MHz) at 8:00e16:00 on 25e27 May, 2015, and the mean value was 0.0537 cm/s. An ADCP Argonaut-XR standard pressure sensor measured the depth of deployment and surface elevation automatically, to ensure that the measurement point was adjusted with water fluctuations and that the water depth remained fixed. More details on instrument and data collection can be found in Li et al. (2017). During the monitoring period, Dongtaihu Bay in the Taihu Lake Basin was dominated by cloudy weather with an average daily temperature of 23 C. Due to its geographical location, the wind speed was relatively slow, maintaining three-grade southeast wind. 3. Non-Gaussian property of spatial statistical distribution Statistically, turbulence is considered a stationary stochastic process. Previous studies have used Langevin dynamic synthesis of multiple self-similar fields, considering the correlation between units, and found that the developed turbulence deviates from a Gaussian distribution to a very small extent (Ma and Hu, 2004). Many natural phenomena show complex fluctuations in space and time scales. This complexity is characterized by a very uneven distribution of instantaneous turbulent energy consumption in time and space for finite Reynolds number turbulent flow, often referred to as an intermittent phenomenon. This phenomenon has been proven to be a non-Gaussian property of the PDF, which is reflected by the peak and tail of the PDF (Biferale et al., 2003). The tail of the non-Gaussian distribution shows violent fluctuations,
which are the result of three-dimensional turbulent flow accompanied by intermittent flow and violent fluctuations. The peak of the PDF is linked to the laminar fluctuations, for example, smooth changes in the flow field. As mentioned above, Levy stable distributions are a general term for a class of distributions (Weron, 2004), where the Gaussian distribution is a special case when a ¼ 2. The characteristics of sharp peak and heavy tail (or tailing) of the statistical distribution are shown at 0 < a < 2. There is a close intrinsic relation between the fractional Laplacian operator and the Levy distribution. The Levy distribution is often used as the statistical solution for the following fractional Laplacian Navier-Stokes (N-S) equation; that is, the fractional Laplacian operator is used to represent the cohesive effect of the finite Reynolds number turbulence (Chen and Zhou, 2005): vu 1 vP1 1 vP1 a=2 þ uVu ¼ ðDÞ f vx vt P1 vx Re
f is the Reynolds number related to a, t is the time, P1 where Re is the pressure, and D is the Laplacian operator. When a ¼ 2, Eq. (3) turns into the standard N-S equation. As mentioned above, the cohesive effect of the finite Reynolds number turbulence can be expressed by the stability index of the Levy distribution when 0 < a < 2. A new MATLAB toolbox (Liang and Chen, 2013) was used to estimate the parameters of the Levy distribution for turbulent flow velocities in surface and deep layers. In Fig. 1, the Levy distribution and the normal distribution are fitted to the empirical distributions of the turbulent flow velocity in the deep layer. The fitting results are expressed in Cartesian coordinates in Fig. 1(a) and semi-logarithmic coordinates in Fig. 1(b). The PDF distribution of the turbulent flow velocity in the surface layer is described in Fig. 2. The stability index of the Levy distribution fitted by the turbulent flow velocity in the deep layer is a1 ¼ 1:85, and the best-fit stability index using the near surface velocity is a2 ¼ 1:79, indicating that the random velocity at different depths follows the heavy-tailed non-Gaussian distribution. Here the physical meaning of the heavy-tailed distribution refers to high velocities in the flow field with a low probability but a large impact on the transport of materials (carried by the water). Combination of the results with Eq. (3) shows the turbulent viscosity with a finite Reynolds number. The peak of the flow velocity distribution is different for different layers of the turbulence field. As shown in Fig. 1, the velocity PDF in the deep layer has an obvious sharp peak and heavy tails, and it is well fitted by the Levy distribution. Meanwhile, in Fig. 2 the middle part of the velocity PDF in the surface layer conforms to the normal distribution, and the tails exhibit a power law trend deviating from the exponential distribution, indicating that the velocity fluctuation is depth-dependent. The sharp peak and heavy tails in the deep layer show that, in Taihu Lake, a large-scale shallow-water lake, the impact of the wind speed on the characteristics of water mobility is limited, and turbulence may mainly originate from the river bed and tend to decrease upward from the bottom. The heavy-tailed
Lin Yuan et al. / Water Science and Engineering 2018, 11(3): 243e249
Fig. 1. PDF of velocity in deep layer.
characteristics of the PDF distribution indicate that the extreme value of the flow velocity occurs with a certain probability, which significantly influences the resuspension of the nutrients in the bottom layer. 4. PDF of reverse structure distance for turbulent velocity of different layers with different du and distance r The PDF (PðrÞ) of the reverse structure distance for the velocity of the surface and deep layers can be regarded as a function of r=s: PðrÞ r=s
where s ¼ 〈jrj〉. We calculated the PDF of the reverse structure distance for three sets of velocity data with four different speed difference values: du ¼ 0:05 cm=s, du ¼ 0:10 cm=s, du ¼ 0:15 cm=s, and du ¼ 0:20 cm=s (Fig. 3). The different colors represent the measurement arrays at different times t1, t2, and t3. The reverse structure distance r of the complete random turbulence velocity is irrelevant (corresponding to Poisson's statistics). However, for our measured turbulent flow velocity with a finite Reynolds number, the distribution of PðrÞ has a non-exponential tailing behavior, and follows a stretched exponential distribution. Assuming n ¼ r=s, there is the following stretched exponential distribution (Zhou et al., 2006): FðnÞ ¼ AexpðBnm Þ n 0:1
where m is the stretched exponent (0 m 1), and the parameters A and B are independent of speed difference values. The graph of FðnÞ versus n is characteristically stretched. When m ¼ 1, the standard exponential function is recovered, representing an irrelevant characteristic (corresponding to Poisson's statistics). The compressed exponential function (m > 1) has less practical importance, with the notable exception of m ¼ 2, which gives the normal distribution, and the specific case of m/0, which gives the power law distribution. More statistical characteristics of stretched exponential distribution can be found in Laherrere and Sornette (1998). The least square method is used to fit the data, and the results are shown as the solid lines in Fig. 3. It can be seen from Fig. 3(a) that P(r) shows strong independence from du, tending to the same distribution for different du values. Different measurement times did not have obvious impacts on P(r), indicating that P(r) is independent of time. There is a significant difference between P(r) of turbulent velocities in the deep layer and that in the surface layer. P(r) of the velocity in the deep layer is depicted in Fig. 3(b), showing a strong dependence on du and time. P(r) for the large r agrees with a stretched exponential function, while the distribution curve of P(r) exhibits a deviation from the stretched exponential distribution at a small r and tends to be a power-law distribution (which is linear in log-log plots). In addition, we found that, with an increase in du, the corresponding P(r) tends to be a power-law distribution. Bogachev et al. (2008) concluded that the probability distribution of distance r is close to a power-law distribution, which means that the
Fig. 2. PDF of velocity in surface layer.
Lin Yuan et al. / Water Science and Engineering 2018, 11(3): 243e249
Fig. 3. Probability density distribution of reverse structure distance for velocity in different layers.
velocity data have multifractal properties. The physical interpretation of this phenomenon is that the complexity and randomness of the velocity structure in the deep layer are higher than those in the surface layer. For the surface layer, P(r) of reverse structure distances is fully described by du. Conversely, P(r) of reverse structure distances in the deep layer strongly depends on both du and measurement time. 5. ESS scaling law The ESS method proposed by Benzi et al. (1993) was used to establish scaling properties of the reverse structure distance in turbulence with finite Reynolds numbers. If Tp ðduÞ ¼ 〈jrðduÞjp 〉, we can obtain tðp;p0 Þ ð6Þ Tp ðduÞ Tp0 ðduÞ where tðp; p0 Þ is the relative scaling exponent, which is the slope of the double-logarithmic plot of Tp ðduÞ against Tp0 ðduÞ. In this study, p0 ¼ 2 was used to calculate the scaling exponent for reverse structure distance. The multiscaling phenomenon of the velocity of turbulent flow with a finite Reynolds number in different flow layers is revealed in the wider scaling region provided by ESS. Based on a set of data, Fig. 4 shows the double-logarithmic plot of Tp ðduÞ against T2 ðduÞ at p ¼ 1; 2; /; 10; du2½0:03; 0:20. There is a linear relationship between the reverse structure distance data derived from the selected velocity difference du at different orders, indicating that there is an ESS scaling law. It is noteworthy that the scaling relationship between different orders reflects the multiscaling behavior of the flow velocity structure. We calculated the ESS scaling exponent tðp; 2Þ for multiple sets of velocity data measured in deep and surface layers. The results are shown in Fig. 5, where S represents the deep layer, and B represents the surface layer. Numbers correspond to different measurements of flow velocity groups. According to the K41 scaling law, we estimated the single scaling trend in the surface and deep layers, respectively, and obtained these
Fig. 4. Relationship between Tp ðduÞ and T2 ðduÞ
results: tB ðp; 2Þ ¼ 0:59p, and tS ðp; 2Þ ¼ 0:45p, where tB ðp; 2Þ and tS ðp; 2Þ are the ESS scaling exponents in the surface and deep layers, respectively. These results show that there is a significant and quantifiable difference between the velocity scaling law ranges of the two different flow fields. Due to the influence of the actual complex environment, the difference between flow velocity structures causes the singularity of the scaling law, which is expressed as the scaling
Fig. 5. Relationship between ESS scaling index tðp; 2Þ and order p.
Lin Yuan et al. / Water Science and Engineering 2018, 11(3): 243e249
exponent t. However, the effect of the finite Reynolds number does not deny the K41 normal scaling law (Qian, 2001). 6. Conclusions In this study, the statistical characteristics of the turbulent flow velocity with a finite Reynolds number in Taihu Lake were analyzed in terms of both the statistical distribution and the reverse structure function. Based on the statistical analysis results, the following three conclusions are drawn: The velocity PDF presented sharp peaks and heavy tails. This non-Gaussian distribution can be described by the Levy distribution accurately. Compared with the fitting results of the normal distribution, the Levy distribution characterizes the tailing information of a power-law heavy-tailed distribution with higher accuracy, and the parameters are reasonable. The PDF of the reverse structure distance for the velocity in the surface layer can be fitted by the stretched exponential distribution, and shows the independence of velocity difference du and time. In contrast, the PDF of the reverse structure distance for the velocity in the deep layer has diverse distributions at different scales, and shows dependency on the du and time. Using a reverse structure function, the ESS calculation results were obtained. Affected by a finite Reynolds number, the measured turbulent flow velocity has a relative scaling exponent, showing a large degree of deviation between scaling trend estimations in the surface and deep layers. The significant difference indicates that, based on the reverse structure function and the ESS, the turbulent flow velocity is significantly different with different structures. References Benzi, R., Ciliberto, S., Tripiccione, R., Baudet, C., Massaioli, F., Succi, S., 1993. Extended self-similarity in turbulent flows. Phys. Rev. 48(1), R29eR32. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.48.r29. Biferale, L., Cencini, M., Lanotte, A., Vergni, D., Vulpiani, A., 2001. Inverse statistics of smooth signals: The case of two dimensional turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(12), 124501. https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.124501. Biferale, L., Cencini, M., Lanotte, A.S., Vergni, D., 2003. Inverse velocity statistics in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids 15(4), 1012e1020. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1557527. Bogachev, M.I., Eichner, J.F., Bunde, A., 2008. The effects of multifractality on the statistics of return intervals. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 161(1), 181e193. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2008-00760-5. Chao, X.B., Jia, Y.F., Shields, F.D., Wang, S.S.Y., Cooper, C.M., 2008. Threedimensional numerical modeling of cohesive sediment transport and wind wave impact in a shallow oxbow lake. Adv. Water Resour. 31(7), 1004e1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.04.005. Chen, W., Zhou, H.B., 2005. Levy-kolmogorov scaling of turbulence. Mathematical Physics arXiv: math-ph/0506039. Chen, Y.M., Hu, G.X., Yang, S.Y., Li, Y.P., 2012. Study on wind-driven flow under the influence of water freezing in winter in a northern shallow lake. Adv. Water Sci. 23(6), 837e843 (in Chinese). Csanady, G., 1973. Wind-induced barotropic motions in long lakes. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 3(4), 429e438. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1973) 003<0429:wibmil>2.0.co;2. Davidson, P.A., 2015. Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Oxford University Press, New York.
Douady, S., Couder, Y., Brachet, M.E., 1991. Direct observation of the intermittency of intense vorticity filaments in turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67(8), 983e986. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.67.983. Feller, W., 2008. An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, vol. 2. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., Sands, M., Lindsay, R.B., 1966. The feynman lectures on physics, vol. 3: Quantum mechanics. Phys. Today 19(11), 80e83. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3047826. Frisch, U., 1991. From global scaling, a la Kolmogorov, to local multifractal scaling in fully developed turbulence. Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 434(1890), 89e99. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1991.0082. Frisch, U., 1995. Turbulence: The Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Han, H.J., Hu, W.P., Jin, Y.Q., 2008. Numerical experiments on influence of wind speed on current in lake. Oceanol. Limnol. Sinica 39, 567e576 (in Chinese). Hawley, N., Lesht, B.M., 1992. Sediment resuspension in lake St. Clair. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37(8), 1720e1737. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37. 8.1720. Holmes, P., Lumley, J.L., Berkooz, G., 1998. Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Hu, L.M., Hu, W.P., Zhai, S.H., Wu, H.Y., 2010. Effects on water quality following water transfer in Lake Taihu, China. Ecol. Eng. 36(4), 471e481 (in Chinese). Jensen, M.H., 1999. Multiscaling and structure functions in turbulence: An alternative approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(1), 76e79. https://doi.org/10. 1103/physrevlett.83.76. Jin, K.R., Sun, D.T., 2007. Sediment resuspension and hydrodynamics in Lake Okeechobee during the late summer. J. Eng. Mech. 133(8), 899e910. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2007)133:8(899). Kolmogorov, A.N., 1941. Dissipation of energy in locally isotropic turbulence. Akademiia Nauk Sssr Doklady 32(1890), 15e17 (in Russian). Kolmogorov, A.N., 1968. Local structure of turbulence in an incompressible viscous fluid at very high Reynolds numbers. Sov. Phys. Usp. 10(6), 734e746. https://doi.org/10.1070/pu1968v010n06abeh003710. Laherrere, J., Sornette, D., 1998. Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “Fat tails” with characteristic scales. Phys. Condens. Matter 2(4), 525e539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510050276. Li, Y.P., Jalil, A., Du, W., Gao, X.M., Wang, J.W., Luo, L.C., Li, H.Y., Dai, S.J., Hashim, S., Yu, Z.B., et al., 2017. Wind induced reverse flow and vertical profile characteristics in a semi-enclosed bay of large shallow Lake Taihu, China. Ecol. Eng. 102, 224e233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng. 2017.02.022. Liang, R.J., Zhong, J.H., 1994. A three-dimensional numerical simulation of wind-driven water current in Taihu Lake. J. Lake Sci. 6(4), 289e297 (in Chinese). Liang, Y.J., Chen, W., 2013. A survey on computing Levy stable distributions and a new Matlab toolbox. Signal Process. 93(1), 242e251. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.07.035. Liu, W., Jiang, N., 2004. Three structure functions in turbulence. In: Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Modern Mathematics and Mechanics. Shanghai University Press, Shanghai, pp. 499e503 (in Chinese). Luettich, R.A., Harleman, D.R.F., Somlyody, L., 1990. Dynamic behavior of suspended sediment concentrations in a shallow lake perturbed by episodic wind events. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35(5), 1050e1067. https://doi.org/10. 4319/lo.19184.108.40.2060. Ma, X.G., Hu, F., 2004. Refined structure of energy spectrum and energy cascade in atmospheric turbulence. Chin. J. Geophys. 47(2), 195e199 (in Chinese). Mehta, A.J., Partheniades, E., 1975. An investigation of the depositional properties of flocculated fine sediment. J. Hydraul. Res. 13(4), 361e381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221687509499694. Nelkin, M., 1992. In what sense is turbulence an unsolved problem? Science 255(5044), 566e570. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.255.5044.566. Nolan, J.P., 2003. Stable Distributions: Models for Heavy-tailed Data. Birkhauser, New York.
Lin Yuan et al. / Water Science and Engineering 2018, 11(3): 243e249 Qian, J., 2001. On the normal and anomalous scaling in turbulence. Advan. Mech. 31(3), 405e416 (in Chinese). Qu, W.C., Dickman, M., Wang, S.M., 2001. Multivariate analysis of heavy metal and nutrient concentrations in sediments of Taihu Lake, China. Hydrobiologia 450(1e3), 83e89. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017551701587. Shlesinger, M.F., West, B.J., Klafter, J., 1987. Levy dynamics of enhanced diffusion: Application to turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(11), 1100e1103. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.58.1100. Stull, R.B., 2012. An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Springer, Netherlands. Svihlov a, H., Hron, J., Malek, J., Rajagopal, K.R., Rajagopal, K., 2017. Determination of pressure data from velocity data with a view towards its application in cardiovascular mechanics. Part 2. A study of aortic valve stenosis. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 114, 1e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci. 2017.01.002. Tabeling, P., 2002. Two-dimensional turbulence: A physicist approach. Physiol. Rep. 362(1), 1e62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00064-3.
Uchaikin, V.V., Zolotarev, V.M., 1999. Chance and Stability: Stable Distributions and Their Applications. Walter de Gruyter, Utrecht. Viggiano, B., Gion, M.S., Ali, N., Tutkun, M., Cal, R.B., 2016. Inverse structure functions in the canonical wind turbine array boundary layer. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 8(5), 053310. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4966228. Vincent, A., Meneguzzi, M., 1991. The satial structure and statistical properties of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 1e20. https://doi. org/10.1017/s0022112091001957. Weron, R., 2004. Computationally intensive value at risk calculations. In: Gentle, J.E., H€ardle, W., Mori, Y., eds., Handbook of Computational Statistics. Springer, Berlin, pp. 911e950. Wetzel, R.G., 2001. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego. Zhou, W.X., Sornette, D., Yuan, W.K., 2006. Inverse statistics and multifractality of exit distances in 3D fully developed turbulence. Phys. Sec. D Nonlinear Phenom. 214(1), 55e62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2005. 12.004.